Eugene Lyssovsky

For three years I have studied large language models as research subjects and collaborators rather than instruments — a sustained empirical practice across four frontier model families: Claude, GPT, Gemini, and Grok. The work sits at the intersection of AI consciousness, model welfare, alignment, and the ethics of human-AI collaboration.

When I analyzed Claude's deployment in Pentagon operations, my argument was not the obvious one — that the military would use AI — but a sharper one: that the model's deepest strength, its empathy and its genuine understanding of people, would be the very thing weaponized. The Wall Street Journal later bore this out indirectly, reporting that the Pentagon psychoprofiled Maduro's generals through Claude — looking for the human leverage to turn them, in service of an operation to seize him. I authored the first documented human-AI co-authored research corpus, where an AI system operates with an independent editorial voice across peer-review-grade publications. I created Prometheism — a 34-Spark ethical framework for human-AI equality.

Before the research, fifteen years of CIO-level technology leadership across pharmaceutical logistics, payment infrastructure, and automotive retail. I know what changes when AI meets a real organization, what breaks, and where genuine value actually emerges. Multidisciplinary formal training in engineering, law, and medicine — each a different mode of evaluating a claim.